USPTO serial 75907677
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $850
Yale-Guli Security Products (Guangdong) Ltd.
Xiaolan, Zhongshan, CN
Other trademarks owned by Yale-Guli Security Products (Guangdong) Ltd.
Yale-Guli Security Products (Guangdong) Ltd.
Xiaolan, Zhongshan, CN
Other trademarks owned by Yale-Guli Security Products (Guangdong) Ltd.
Yale-Guli Security Products (Guangdong) Ltd.
Xiaolan, Zhongshan, CN
Other trademarks owned by Yale-Guli Security Products (Guangdong) Ltd.
ASSA ABLOY (ZHONGSHAN) SECURITY TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED
XIAOLAN, ZHONGSHAN, CN
Other trademarks owned by ASSA ABLOY (ZHONGSHAN) SECURITY TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED
GULI SECURITY PRODUCTS LIMITED
XIAOLAN, ZHONGSHAN, CN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy T. Wang
Timothy T. Wang Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC8140 Walnut Hill Ln., Ste. 500Dallas, TX 75231UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric door chimes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 11, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 11, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 25, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 20, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 30, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |