USPTO serial 75907848
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Melbourne VIC 3000, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRENT E. ROUTMAN
BRENT E ROUTMAN MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | equipment for recordal and transmission of images and sounds relating to external events, namely sporting fixtures and concerts; computer software used for broadcasting information via the Internet; multi-media software recorded on cd-rom for use in broadcasting via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | management of performing artists and professional athletes; dissemination of advertising material over the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | bulletin board services in the field of broadcasting; providing multiple user access to a global computer network for access to information databases; telecommunication services, namely electronic transmission of data, images and documents via computer terminals; telecommunication services, namely personal communication services; electronic mail services; delivery of messages and images by electronic transmission; telecommunication gateway services; audio, radio, video and digital broadcasting; rental of broadcasting equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Provision of storage facilities for master tapes, films and video and audio archives | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Duplication of video tapes and images in video cassettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | education services, namely provision of educational material to secondary and tertiary students via the Internet; publication of electronic books and journals; entertainment services, namely provision of films and concerts via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development and design of computer software for others; computer services, namely creating and designing web sites for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server on a global computer network; licensing and transfer of marketing and intellectual property rights | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |