USPTO serial 75907887
OILSEED PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 2002
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OILSEED PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives
Inver Grove Heights, MN
Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives
Inver Grove Heights, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Randall King
D RANDALL KING MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale and retail distributorships of specialty oilseeds for both edible and industrial oils; cooperative advertising and marketing of specialty oilseeds for both edible and industrial oils | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Delivery of specialty oilseeds for both edible and industrial oils, namely, freight transportation by railcar, truck and ship | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |