USPTO serial 75908161
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Cape Town, Western Cape, ZA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD P GEORGET
ELIZABETH ATKINS DUANE MORRIS LLP380 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Fishing knives | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Travel bags, all-purpose sports bags, and backpacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Fishing vests | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Fishing equipment, namely, sportsman's fishing bags, fishing tackle and fishing tackle boxes, fishing creels; fishing lures and artificial fishing bait, clamps for securing fishing equipment on body; winging material for fishing jigs and streamers; fishing poles, fishing floats; fishing hooks; fishing leaders; fishing lines; hand held fishing nets for sportsmen; fishing plugs, fishing spinners; fishing sinkers; ground fishing pole holders, fishing pole holders worn on the body, fishing reels; fishing rod blanks, fishing rod handles, fishing rod holders, fishing rods; fishing safety harnesses | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |