USPTO serial 75908345
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Long Grove, IL
Other trademarks owned by LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Long Grove, IL
Other trademarks owned by LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Long Grove, IL
Other trademarks owned by LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
CHICAGO, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul R. Kitch
Paul R. Kitch Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.300 South Wacker DriveSuite 2500Chicago, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Insurance claim auditing in the field of medical bill auditing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 18, 1999 |
| 036 | Insurance services, namely, property and casualty insurance underwriting; services rendered to insurers and insureds, namely, insurance consultation, risk assessment and management, claims processing and administration and loss control, namely, case management, disability management, insurance claims administration in the field of managed health care, rehabilitation and utilization management; underwriting and claims adjustment services for extended warranty contracts for the repair and maintenance of business equipment and loss control services related to maintenance and repair of business equipment; and financial services, namely, underwriting fidelity and surety bonds and financial consultation in the field of controlling maintenance, repair and operational expenses associated with business equipment and in the field of insurance risk management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 18, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 19, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |