USPTO serial 75908432
SEA HAG SOAPS HANDMADE ALL NATURAL VEGETABLE SOAP BOX 1064 BRACKNEY, PA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEA HAG SOAPS HANDMADE ALL NATURAL VEGETABLE SOAP BOX 1064 BRACKNEY, PA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN L PERTICONE
JOHN L PERTICONE LEVEN GOULDIN & THOMPSON LLPP O BOX F-1706BINGHAMTON, NY 13902-0106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [BASED ON USE IN COMMERCE] SKIN SOAPS; [BASED ON INTENT TO USE] LAUNDRY DETERGENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KANE, COLLEEN H.
- Other trademarks owned by KANE, COLLEEN H.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SEA HAG SOAPS HANDMADE ALL NATURAL VEGETABLE SOAP BOX 1064 BRACKNEY, PA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |