USPTO serial 75908480
ON OFFICE NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ON OFFICE NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BUENOS AIRES, AR
Sao Paulo, BR
Sao Paulo, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur S. Garrett
ARTHUR S GARRETT FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line retail services featuring office supplies, namely, boxes, Christmas cards, clips, glue, envelopes, tags, staplers, paper, commercial books, pencils, pens, cassettes, videotapes, palm top, electronic organizers, fax machines, calculators, digital cameras, recordable CDs, CD recorders, modems, mouse pads, mouses, drives, zip disks, zip drives, tables, cupboards, chairs, baskets, sugar, mineral water, coffee, cappuccino, milk, cleaning supplies, soap, garbage bags; and/or export and import agency services available via global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |