Drawing for OFFICENET

USPTO serial 75908481

OFFICENET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OFFICENET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur S. Garrett

ARTHUR S GARRETT FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail services featuring office supplies, namely, boxes, Christmas cards, clips, glue, envelopes, tags, staplers, paper, commercial books, pencils, pens, cassettes, videotapes, palm top, electronic organizers, fax machines, calculators, digital cameras, recordable CDs, CD recorders, modems, mouse pads, mouses, drives, zip disks, zip drives, tables, cupboards, chairs, baskets, sugar, mineral water, coffee, cappuccino, milk, cleaning supplies, soap, garbage bags; export and import agency services available via global computer networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jan 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jan 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 5, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 7, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 7, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 7, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 3, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 3, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 6, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 5, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance