USPTO serial 75908527
MARK WAHLBERG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MARK WAHLBERG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARVEY S. HERTZ
HARVEY S HERTZ LAW OFFICE OF HARVEY S HERTZ9777 WILSHIRE BLVDBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, live entertainment comprising dramatic performances and musical performances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |