USPTO serial 75908944
CASSIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CASSIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Densitron Technologies Limited
Westerham, Kent TN16 3BW, GB
Densitron Technologies Limited
Westerham, Kent TN16 3BW, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRYSTE 1200224 S MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER MONITORS; COMPUTER KEYBOARDS; COMPUTER MICE; COMPUTER PRINTERS; LAP TOP COMPUTERS AND PALM TOP COMPUTERS; COMPUTER MEMORIES; COMPUTER DISK DRIVES; COMPUTER FLOPPY DISK DRIVES; COMPUTER CD-ROM DRIVES; DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS, NAMELY DATA PROCESSORS; WORD PROCESSORS; VIDEO AND AUDIO TAPES, VIDEO AND AUDIO CASSETTES, PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, COMPUTER DISKS AND DIGITAL VERSATILE DISKS, ALL BLANK; READ-ONLY COMPUTER MEMORY; BLANK MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS; BLANK VIDEO CD'S; RADIOS; PHONOGRAPH RECORD PLAYERS; COMPACT PLAYERS; DIGITAL VERSATILE DISK PLAYERS; AUDIO CASSETTE PLAYERS; AUDIO SPEAKERS; FACSIMILE MACHINES; AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |