USPTO serial 75909192
B2B AS IT SHOULD BE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELTSCH, KEITH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B2B AS IT SHOULD BE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SCHAUMBURG, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Nabor
JOSEPH T NABOR FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LASALLE STSTE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTERIZED ON LINE INFORMATION AND ORDERING SERVICE FEATURING THE WHOLESALE AND RETAIL DISTRIBUTION OF A WIDE VARIETY OF GOODS AND SERVICES ALL RELATED TO THE OPERATION OF A BUSINESS INCLUDING COMMENTARY AND RATING SYSTEMS AND CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED THERETO | ACTIVE | May 11, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |