USPTO serial 75909225
Serial No. 75909225
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75909225?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin L. Russell
KEVIN L RUSSELL CHERNOFF, VILHAUER, MCCLUNG & STENZEL1600 ODS TWR601 S W SECOND AVEPORTLAND, OR 97204-3157Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | networkable computer software in the field of interactive business training and management, namely, software for use in training business work teams to increase autonomy and business management responsibility | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |