USPTO serial 75909640
LEGALCONCIERGE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEGALCONCIERGE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paula J. Krasny
PAULA J KRASNY BAKER & MCKENZIE130 E RANDOLPH DRONE PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting and referral services in the field of assisting legal professionals with litigation and legal support services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Database development services in the field of online legal resources; Providing an online directory of legal related web pages and links to other legal related websites, namely, not-for-profit, governmental, judicial and international resources via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |