Drawing for RETURN TO A NATURAL WAY OF EATING

USPTO serial 75909642

RETURN TO A NATURAL WAY OF EATING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RETURN TO A NATURAL WAY OF EATING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Broccolo

Andrew J. Broccolo Topco Holdings, Inc.150 Northwest Point BlvdElk Grove Village, IL 60007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029vegetable shortening, sandwich spread, namely, fruit-based sandwich spread and meat-based sandwich spread, canned and frozen fruits and vegetables, frozen fish and poultry, dairy products, namely, cheese, butter, and canned evaporated milk, and miscellaneous grocery products, namely, mincemeat, shelled nuts, applesauce, jellies and jams, dried fruits, unflavored and unsweetened gelatin, processed olives, peanut butter, olive oil, and picklesACTIVE—
030Coffee, tea, salad dressing, tartar sauce, wheat flour, spaghetti, macaroni and noodles, rice, catsup, table syrup, and flavored and sweetened gelatinACTIVE—
032Canned and frozen fruit juices, namely orange juice, grapefruit juice, apple juice, and a blend of orange juice and grapefruit juice, bottled apple juice, and bottled prune juiceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 22, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 30, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 7, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance