USPTO serial 75909648
RETURN TO A NATURAL WAY OF LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RETURN TO A NATURAL WAY OF LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Broccolo
Andrew J. Broccolo Topco Holdings, Inc.150 Northwest Point BlvdElk Grove Village, IL 60007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |