Drawing for MEGA METERING SYSTEM

USPTO serial 75909666

MEGA METERING SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEGA METERING SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald P. Kananen

RONALD P KANANEN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUERLION BLDG1233 20TH ST NW STE 501WASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007food processing machines, namely machines for conveying food products, namely, meat, poultry and dog food during processingACTIVE—
009food processing machines, namely machines for measuring and weighing food products, namely meat, poultry and dog food during processing; food processing machines, namely a measuring and weighing machine for meat, poultry and dog food which features a conveyorACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 13, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 13, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 23, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 7, 2003EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Nov 22, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 30, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 24, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance