USPTO serial 75909666
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald P. Kananen
RONALD P KANANEN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUERLION BLDG1233 20TH ST NW STE 501WASHINGTON, DC 20036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | food processing machines, namely machines for conveying food products, namely, meat, poultry and dog food during processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | food processing machines, namely machines for measuring and weighing food products, namely meat, poultry and dog food during processing; food processing machines, namely a measuring and weighing machine for meat, poultry and dog food which features a conveyor | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 7, 2003 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |