USPTO serial 75909681
COUNTRY MUSIC CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COUNTRY MUSIC CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel T. Beres
JOEL T BERES STITES & HARBISON PLLC400 W MARKET ST STE 1800LOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3362UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Nightclub and restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |