USPTO serial 75909951
CLASSICOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLASSICOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GREAT NECK, NY
GREAT NECK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH SOFER
JOSEPH SOFER SOFER & HAROUN LLP215 Lexington Ave1301NEW YORK, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Personal communication devices and accessories, namely, handheld mobile communication systems, namely, telephone handsets, wrist watch mounted telephones, foldable electronic keypads, detachable telephone ear-pieces, wireless electronic display panels, wireless keypads, and wireless electronic personal organizers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |