USPTO serial 75909988
CERTIFIED CHAROLAIS BEEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CERTIFIED CHAROLAIS BEEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald J. Lenkszus
DONALD J LENKSZUS DONALD J LENKSZUS, PCP O BOX 3064CAREFREE, AZ 85377UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Beef | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |