USPTO serial 75910151
KITCHENCOMPANION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KITCHENCOMPANION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee F. Sachnoff
LEE F SACHNOFF KRENDL KRENDL SACHNOFF & WAY, PC370 SEVENTEENTH STSTE 5350DENVER, CO 80202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERIZED SELF-CONTAINED COMMUNICATION UNIT FOR RECEIVING AND SENDING INFORMATION REGARDING CLOTHING, FOOD, GROCERIES, FINANCIAL INFORMATION, NEWS AND REFERENCE INFORMATION, LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES INFORMATION AND OTHER GOODS AND SERVICES FOR THE HOUSEHOLD BY MEANS OF A VIRTUAL PRIVATE COMPUTER NETWORK, PRIVATE COMPUTER NETWORK OR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES FEATURING CLOTHING, FOOD, GROCERIES, ELECTRONICS GOODS, CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND RECIPES, AND COMPUTER SERVICES, PROVIDING ON-LINE INFORMATION RELATED TO RECORDS KEEPING AND RECORDS STORAGE SERVICES FOR PRODUCT WARRANTIES AND MANUALS, AND PRODUCT PURCHASE INFORMATION BY MEANS OF A VIRTUAL PRIVATE COMPUTER NETWORK, A PRIVATE COMPUTER NETWORK OR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING ON-LINE INFORMATION RELATED TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES INFORMATION, ON-LINE VOTING AND REVENUE COLLECTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lake Creek Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lake Creek Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named KITCHENCOMPANION
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |