USPTO serial 75910512
MICRONETWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICRONETWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scotts Valley, CA
Scotts Valley, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Packet, circuit, and wireless switching exchanges composed of commute operating programs; digital/analog computer hardware, computer software and computer firmware used for the transmission, reception, and processing of communications within, between and among computer network system nodes, data communications and telecommunications network systems; integrated circuits, multi-microchips on a package, printed circuit boards, interface card, computer add-on cards and related parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |