USPTO serial 75910646
FLEXECUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLEXECUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn A Gundersen
GLENN A GUNDERSEN DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS4000 BELL ATLANTIC TWR1717 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2793Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing order routing and execution services via a global computer network by which securities brokers and dealers may make securities transaction bids with specified contingencies directly to the securities marketplace | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRASS UTILITY, LLC, THE
- Other trademarks owned by BRUT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BRUT ECN LLC, THE
- Other trademarks owned by BRUT ECN LLC, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named FLEXECUTION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |