USPTO serial 75910948
JINI COMMUNITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JINI COMMUNITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SALLY M ABEL
SALLY M ABEL ESQ FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VLY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 93635Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; computer programs for use in developing and executing other computer programs; computer software for use in networking a wide variety of computer hardware, computer software, and electronic devices; computer peripherals, and instructional manuals in association therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |