Drawing for PRIVACARD.COM

USPTO serial 75910950

PRIVACARD.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIVACARD.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven W. Smith

STEVEN W SMITH SMITH & DANAMRAJ, PC840 CENTRAL PKWY ESTE 120PLANO, TX 75074

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial analysis and consultation, namely credit inquiry and consultation, evaluation of credit bureau data, financial information provided by electronic means, financial research, and financial forecasting; automated teller machine services; banking services, namely check cashing, check verification, check processing, money order services, mortgage lending, electronic funds transfer, and travelers' check issuance; savings and loan services; administration of employee benefit plans; administration of prepaid health care plans; calling card services; electronic processing of insurance claims and payment data; credit card services; credit card verification; cash replacement rendered by credit card; debit card services; credit agencies; credit bureaus; financial clearing houses; credit unions; leasing of apartments; providing rebates at participating establishments of others through use of a membership cardACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 28, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance