Drawing for GRANNIE SOFTWARE

USPTO serial 75911192

GRANNIE SOFTWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRANNIE SOFTWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GORDON E. R. TROY, PC

GORDON E R TROY, PCP O BOX 368CHARLOTTE, VT 05445UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for use by senior citizens, namely, computer software that assists seniors in using computers and in using and accessing global computer networks; adapted software for simplifying access to, and use of, global computer networks, global computer network search engines, e-mail accounts, letter writing and games; computer peripherals, namely, keyboard, mouse, monitor, and printerACTIVE—
042providing a website on global computer networks containing information of interest to senior citizens, namely, simplification and organization computer software and other computer access and use tools directed to the needs of senior citizens, such as larger print and simplified computer useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 9, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 14, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 14, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 3, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 3, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 5, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance