Drawing for Serial No. 75911370

USPTO serial 75911370

Serial No. 75911370

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75911370?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eugene E Renz Jr

205 N MONROE STP 0 BOX 2056MEDIA, PA 19063-9056

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER SOLD IN BULK; ANIMAL SKINS, FURS SOLD IN BULK, HARNESS FITTINGS AND SADDLERY, NAMELY, HARNESS STRAPS, HARNESSES, SADDLES, SADDLERY, PADS FOR HORSE SADDLES AND COVERS FOR HORSE SADDLES MADE FROM GENUINE SHEEPSKIN AND KNITTED WOOLACTIVEAug 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 6, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 6, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance