Drawing for AADVANTAGE DINING

USPTO serial 75911404

AADVANTAGE DINING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AADVANTAGE DINING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay Lyn Schwartz

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ AMERICAN AIRLINESMD 5675 (6W5B-57)P O BOX 619616DFW AIRPORT, TX 75261-9616

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Promoting the goods and services of others by means of an incentive awards program, whereby purchase points are awarded for purchases made from vendor subscriber restaurants which can then be redeemed for merchandise and travelACTIVEDec 1, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance