Drawing for SILAMER

USPTO serial 75911444

SILAMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILAMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William Millen

WILLIAM MILLEN MILLEN, WHITE ZELANO, & BRANIGAN, PCARLINGTON COURTHOUSE PLZ I2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001CHEMICAL PRODUCTS USED IN INDUSTRY, NAMELY ADHESION PROMOTERS AND CROSSLINKING REAGENTS; CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES FOR MODIFYING THE SURFACES OF ORGANIC MATERIALS AND INORGANIC MATERIALS FOR USE IN ADHESIVE AND SEALANTS INDUSTRY, CABLE INDUSTRY, PLASTICS INDUSTRY, COATING INDUSTRY, FILLER AND GLASS FIBER INDUSTRYACTIVE—
002CHEMICAL MATERIALS BASED ON SILANES AND/OR POLYSILOXANES FOR COATING PLASTICS, METAL, GLASS, PORCELAIN, ENAMEL, CONCRETE, AND NATURAL MATERIALS SUCH AS WOOD, SILK, HEMP, SISAL, SANDSTONE, AND MINERALS FOR PROTECTION AGAINST DIRT, WATER, UV RAYS, MECHANICAL, THERMAL, AND CHEMICAL INFLUENCESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance