USPTO serial 75911483
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian J. Warren
JAKE D FELDMAN MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWATTN TMSUWASHINGTON, DC 20004| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Development and implementation of promotional campaigns and incentive programs for businesses through the creation and distribution of promotional materials, awards and incentive products; retail store services featuring publications, promotional products, personal gifts, business gifts corporate gifts, organizational gifts, awards, trophies, and products related to promotions, training, motivation, leadership, management, incentives and recognition; counseling in the fields of awards, leadership, management, training, advertising, promotion, motivation, incentives and recognition; preparation of audio and audiovisual materials for advertising the goods and services of others; employment counseling and recruiting | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES, DOCUMENTS, AUDIO AND AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS, AND DATA VIA THE INTERNET; PROVIDING ON-LINE CHAT ROOMS AND ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS FOR TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION AND MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING PROMOTIONS, TRAINING, MOTIVATION, LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, INCENTIVES AND RECOGNITION | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |