USPTO serial 75911677
CARE/TD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARE/TD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent L Ramik
VINCENT L RAMIK DILLER RAMIK & WIGHT PC7345 MCWHORTER PL STE 101ANNANDALE, VA 22003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | TRANSPORTATION OF CARGO, PASSENGERS AND/OR GOODS BY AIR, TRAIN AND TRUCK, AND WAREHOUSE AND CARGO STORAGE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |