USPTO serial 75911699
G FIRST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2911330Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2004
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with G FIRST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN P. FREDRICKSON
JOHN P. FREDRICKSON Boyle Fredrickson, S.C.840 N. Plankinton AvenueMilwaukee, WI 53203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SPORTSWEAR AND ATHLETIC CLOTHING, NAMELY T-SHIRTS AND ATHLETIC JERSEYS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 10, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |