USPTO serial 75911858
NUSHAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUSHAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Granville, New South Wales, 2142, AU
Granville, New South Wales, 2142, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan P Willson
SUSAN P WILLSON SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAYSTE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5141Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PROTEIN FOOD SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND GAME; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUIT AND VEGETABLES; PREPACKAGED PORTION CONTROLLED MEALS, CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, POULTRY, FISH, GRAINS, PULSES, LEGUMES, SAUCES AND SPICES; FROZEN AND REFRIGERATED DINNERS AND MEALS, CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, POULTRY, FISH, VEGETABLES, GRAINS, PULSES, LEGUMES, SAUCES AND SPICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CONTRACT FOOD AND BEVERAGE SERVICES; MEDICAL HYGIENIC SERVICES AND BEAUTY SALONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |