USPTO serial 75911867
NORCROSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2537225Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2002
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NORCROSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Orlando, FL
Orlando, FL
NORCROSS MARINE PRODUCTS, INC.
Orlando, FL
NORCROSS MARINE PRODUCTS, INC.
ORLANDO, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L Sigalow
Gregory E Lentine NorCross Marine Products, Inc6881 Kingspointe PkwySte 8Orlando, FL 32819Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic products for marine and nautical use, namely, echo sounders, speed indicators, sonar detectors, depth finders and global positioning navigational systems | EXPIRED | Feb 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lentek International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lentek International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NORCROSS MARINE PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NORCROSS MARINE PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NORCROSS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |