USPTO serial 75912068
ALLANCE THE TASTE OF QUALITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALLANCE THE TASTE OF QUALITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD SCOTT DRAUGHON
CHERYL MEIDE DRAUGHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW814 A1A N STE 307PONTE VEDRA BEACH, FL 32082UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meats and poultry, namely smoked duck, boar, venison, other fresh game, beef and chicken products | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |