USPTO serial 75912119
ULTRAVCD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRAVCD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Clitheroe, Lancashire BB7 1PE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRIET E. PERKINS
HARRIET E PERKINS SEIDEL, GONDA, LAVORGNA & MONACO, PCSTE 1800 TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer firmware and computer software used for designing conservatories, conservatory roofs and glazed roofs; media used for storage and transmission of digital data in the form of pre-recorded tapes and discs relating to conservatory, conservatory roof and glazed roof design; computer programs for use in designing conservatories, conservatory roofs and glazed roofs; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers, recording discs, optical discs, laser discs, compact discs, magnetic discs and floppy discs all relating to conservatory, conservatory roof and glazed roof design; computer software for computer-aided design; computer-aided design systems composed of computers, computer hardware and computer software used for computer-aided design of conservatories, conservatory roofs and glazed roofs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter relating to conservatory, conservatory roof and glazed roof design; books; periodical publications relating to conservatories, conservatory roofs and glazed roof design; magazines in the field of conservatories, conservatory roofs and glazed roof design; journals in the field of conservatories, conservatory roofs and glazed roof design; pamphlets in the field of conservatories, conservatory roofs and glazed roof design; brochures in the field of conservatories, conservatory roofs and glazed roof design; instructional and teaching materials on the subject of conservatories, conservatory roofs and glazed roof design; printed diagrams and illustrations; printed matter relating to computer-aided design, namely instruction manuals in the field of computer-aided design of conservatories, conservatory roofs and glazed roofs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |