Drawing for BIG BROTHER

USPTO serial 75912216

BIG BROTHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG BROTHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041motion picture film production of motion pictures based on the novel "1984" by George Orwell; entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game based on the novel "1984" by George OrwellACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 26, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 26, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 25, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 23, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 5, 2009RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 5, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 15, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 15, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2007ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Oct 24, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 12, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 16, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 8, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance