Drawing for SBC DATACOMM

USPTO serial 75912360

SBC DATACOMM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SBC DATACOMM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID J CHO

DAVID J CHO SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC175 E HOUSTON ST FL 4SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205-2255UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely, telephone communication services, paging, cellular phone services, telephone voice messaging, voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; personal communication services, electronic, digital and cellular transmission of data communications; cable television broadcasting services; electronic transmission of voice and data; and providing telecommunications connections to a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 5, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance