Drawing for MESSAGING CLOUD

USPTO serial 75912398

MESSAGING CLOUD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MESSAGING CLOUD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heidi L. Sachs

HEIDI L SACHS PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consultation in the technical facilitation of electronic commerce and business transactions via a global computer network; consultation in the fields of computer software, computer hardware, computer hardware design, information technology and computer networks; computer software design for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting, monitoring and controlling computer hardware and software via a global computer network; installation, operation, and maintenance of computer software; creating and maintaining web sites for others; designing and implementing network web pages for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; repair and installation services for computer software; providing online information in the field of Internet infrastructure, namely, the linking of computers and computer networks, website development and management, computer hardware and software for the design, development, management and implementation of electronic commerce systems and websitesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 16, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance