USPTO serial 75912545
MOOSEHEAD CEDAR LOG HOMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2806069Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 2004
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOOSEHEAD CEDAR LOG HOMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Moosehead Wood Components, Inc.
Greenville, ME
Moosehead Wood Components, Inc.
Greenville, ME
Moosehead Wood Components, Inc.
Pittsfield, ME
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | custom manufacturer of cedar log homes and other wood components, namely, mulch, firewood, lumber and cedar furniture excepting bar furniture | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Moosehead Wood Components, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Moosehead Wood Components, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Moosehead Wood Components, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named MOOSEHEAD CEDAR LOG HOMES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 30, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2014 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 17, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |