USPTO serial 75912613
NUTRIENT DELIVERY SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUTRIENT DELIVERY SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
OCEAN NUTRITION CANADA LIMITED
Nova Scotia, B4A 327, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SONDRA D. SOHOL, SAMUEL DIGIROLALAMO, ALAN S. NOMES, RALPH W. KALISH, JR., REBECCA J. BRANDAU, ROBERT LEWIS, LAWRENCE E. EVANS, CAROL J. HAMILTON, SHERRY G. HANLON, MARK E. STALLION, WENDY L. BOLDT
BLACKWELL, SANDERS, PEPER, MARTIN, LLP720 OLIVE ST FL 24ST LOUIS, MO 63101-2338UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietary supplements; nutritional animal feed additives and pet food additives | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |