Drawing for SKINNY STICKS

USPTO serial 75912671

SKINNY STICKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKINNY STICKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Ball

JOHN S BALL FISHER, TOUSEY, LEAS & BALLONE INDEPENDENT DR STE 2600JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Food for medically restricted diets used for health, nutrition and weight loss purposes; dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement used for health, nutrition and weight loss purposes; nutritional supplements used for health, nutrition and weight loss purposes; diet pills used for health, nutrition and weight loss purposes; dietary food supplements used for health, nutrition and weight loss purposesACTIVE—
029Ground nut-based, tree nut-based or fruit-based snack food, namely, nutritional barsACTIVE—
030Granola based snack bars; ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars; grain based food bars; and grain-based snack bars; grain-based nutritional barsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 1, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
May 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 8, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 7, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance