USPTO serial 75912696
I SIMPLIFY!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I SIMPLIFY!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
78434 Louveciennes, FR
78434 Louveciennes, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward J. Kondracki
EDWARD J KONDRACKI MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, PC1751 PINNACLE DR STE 500MCLEAN, VA 22102-3833UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Encoded electronic chip cards and smart cards containing programming used in connection as an Internet secured interface | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |