Drawing for MEINEKE EXPRESS

USPTO serial 75912752

MEINEKE EXPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEINEKE EXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rodney K. Caldwell

RODNEY K CALDWELL HOWREY SIMON ARNOLD & WHITE, LLP750 BERING DRHOUSTON, TX 77057UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035FRANCHISING SERVICES, NAMELY OFFERING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF SHOPS PROVIDING RETAIL AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SERVICESACTIVE—
037AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SHOP SERVICES FEATURING MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF AUTOMOBILES AND LIGHT TRUCKS; MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF AUTOMOBILES AND LIGHT TRUCKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 19, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 20, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 31, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance