USPTO serial 75913209
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Springs, CO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Gardner
ROBERT S GARDNER5540 TECH CTR DRSTE 202COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80919| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Commercial building management services, namely scheduling of repair, security, safety and upkeep of buildings | ACTIVE | Dec 17, 2002 |
| 037 | Building repair and installation services, namely providing commercial building facility maintenance and repair of buildings and building systems and scheduling building maintenance | ACTIVE | Dec 17, 2002 |
| 038 | Telecommunications, namely designing, installing, and maintaining telecommunications voice and data systems, wiring, cables, and other connection devices and carriers for commercial and residential applications; installing and maintaining telecommunications cable, fiber, wiring, and other carriers between facilities and premises and switching locations; telecommunications tower installation and support building construction | ACTIVE | Dec 17, 2002 |
| 039 | Packaging and storage of goods, namely providing warehousing and shipping and receiving, and inventory management and control services | ACTIVE | Dec 17, 2002 |
| 042 | Design, installation, and testing of digital microwave systems and wireless systems, telecommunications project engineering, planning, system design and testing for others; repair and update of building environmental systems software and equipment; management and logistics support services, namely providing management of industrial and commercial facilities and buildings including all services necessary for the maintenance, repair, security, safety, and upkeep of the facility or building | ACTIVE | Dec 17, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |