USPTO serial 75913300
DENTACARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENTACARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dun Laugnaire, Co. Dublin, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH J. SHEEHAM
KENNETH J SHEEHAM BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2003 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |