USPTO serial 75913389
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary B. Scott
JOHN M KIM GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLPSTE 11004365 EXECUTIVE DRSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-2133| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LABORATORY EQUIPMENT FOR USE IN HIGH SPEED CONTINUOUS SCANNING CYTOMETRY WHERE STAGE MOTION, AUTO FOCUS, AND IMAGE ACQUISITION OPERATE SIMULTANEOUSLY, NAMELY, CYTOMETERS, LASERS, COMPUTERS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE WHICH AUTOMATES THE HARDWARE COMPONENTS OF THE LABORATORY EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |