Drawing for BIOTRIVIA

USPTO serial 75913540

BIOTRIVIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOTRIVIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016BOOKS AND MAGAZINES FEATURING INFORMATION REGARDING THE LIVES OF FAMOUS, HISTORICAL AND NOTEWORTHY INDIVIDUALSACTIVE—
041EDUCATION AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY TELEVISION GAME SHOWS; EDUCATlON AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVDlNG AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FEATURING THE LIVES OF FAMOUS, HISTORICAL NOTEWORTHY INDIVIDUALSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 6, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 19, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 4, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 23, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 11, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 10, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 27, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance