USPTO serial 75913797
ROLLVISION REMOTE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR FILM AND VIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2516481Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2001
- Examiner
- BUTLER, ANDREA P
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROLLVISION REMOTE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR FILM AND VIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael N. Cohen
Michael N. Cohen Cohen I.P. Law Group, P.C.9025 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 301Beverly Hills, CA 90211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | 3-axis, gyro-stabilized, remote camera head with roll, pan and tilt capability, and featuring a 3 point isolation mount, interchangeable camera formats and interchangeable platforms for use in motion picture and television industries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 10, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Coptervision, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Coptervision, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Coptervision, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ROLLVISION REMOTE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR FILM AND VIDEO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2007 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |