Drawing for CRY WOLF THE FALSE ALARM SOLUTION

USPTO serial 75913908

CRY WOLF THE FALSE ALARM SOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2711707Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 29, 2003
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CRY WOLF THE FALSE ALARM SOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Wadyka, Jr.

Steven J. Wadyka, Jr. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLPSUITE 10002101 L STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for the purpose of assisting emergency personnel in government agencies and private industry during emergencies, disasters and catastrophes, namely computer software that tracks, processes, documents, and accounts for false alarms by analyzing, summarizing, charting, graphing, and color coding alarm incident information and sending notification and billing forms to businesses and/or residences where the false alarm originatedSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 5, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 10, 2023CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Apr 29, 2022REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 12, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 25, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 30, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 10, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 3, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
May 13, 2013RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 13, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 13, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 18, 2013E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 6, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 27, 2009E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2009ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 12, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 29, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 10, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Feb 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 13, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance