Drawing for ENERGIVIT

USPTO serial 75913928

ENERGIVIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGIVIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James D. Halsey, Jr.

MICHAEL J BADAGLIACCA STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF PHENYLKETONURA AND/OR OTHER INHERITED DISORDERS OF AMINO ACID METABOLISM; DIETETIC SUBSTANCES ADAPTED FOR MEDICAL USE, NAMELY, FOOD FOR MEDICALLY RESTRICTED DIETS, FOOD FOR DIABETICS, FOOD FOR ENTERAL FEEDING, FOOD SUPPLEMENTS, MEAL REPLACEMENT DRINKS, MEAL REPLACEMENT POWDERS; FOOD FOR BABIES AND INVALIDS; AND PROTEIN-FREE FORMULAS FOR USE IN NUTRITIONAL THERAPY FOR PERSONS SUFFERING FROM METABOLIC DISORDERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 5, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 14, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jun 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2005OTHECASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION—
Dec 15, 2004PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2004IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Oct 14, 2004PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 31, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 16, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance